兔友首页游戏论坛游戏下载游戏库游戏视频小游戏小说论坛动漫论坛电影论坛
发新话题
打印

HD4870X2 全球首测!!

HD4870X2 全球首测!!

Introduction

     For the past year and a half ATI have had a tough time competing with Nvidia at the high end of the graphics card market. Products such as the 2900 and 3800 series struggled to perform at levels comparable to the GeForce 8800, 9800 and GTX 280 however ATI did eventually work out a good pricing structure which made them attractive to consumers.
     More recently the launch of the 4800 series did two things. Firstly ATI had a card which performed at a similar level to the second fastest GTX, the 260. Secondly both the 4850 and 4870 were priced very aggressively which is tempting to those looking at a great price/performance ratio.
     So what of a product to compete with the GTX 280? Well that is why we are here today, in the last day or so ATI supplied us with an early sample of the R700 giving us the opportunity to see how it compares to cards which are already on the market.
     We should however state that ATI have placed some limitations on what we can and cannot say about the R700 at this time and therefore a full outline of the card and performance analysis will be published at a later date.


The R700


Front



Back



Dvi




Power



      The R700 is reminiscent of the reference design 3870 X2 although it has gone through a slight makeover with the PCB, cooler and DVIs now black. The cooler is a two slot model with a fan which runs at approximately 1500rpm at idle (expect this to be lower at launch). The fan blows air over two blocks of copper which draw heat from the GPU’s and the air is then exhausted out of the case.
      The back features two retention brackets which hold the GPU blocks in place and there is also a large cover which acts as a heatsink for the memory that is installed on this side of the card. In terms of memory we have 1 GB of GDDR5 on each side of the card and each RV770 GPU has access to its own gigabyte. It is also possible to see the single CrossFire connector on the top right of the card which tells us we can add a second Radeon to our configuration for additional performance. The two most likely candidates would be a second R700 or a 4870.
There are two power sockets on the R700, just as there were on the older X2 model, meaning we need a PSU with at least one six pin and one eight pin plug to power the card. Outputs on the reference model come in the form of two dual-link DVIs as well as TV-out.
      All 4800 series features such as HDCP, AvivoHD, DirectX 10.1, PCI-Express 2.0 and HDMI with 7.1 channel audio are all present on this card. Essentially take two 4870 1 GB cards, combine them onto one PCB and you have the R700 engineering sample.

本帖最近评分记录
  • xiaorayi 胡萝卜素 +10 争取下次找中文的- -不过这个很权威啊 2008-7-14 14:43
  • xiaorayi 闪耀度 +1 争取下次找中文的- -不过这个很权威啊 2008-7-14 14:43
  • chen4620263 胡萝卜素 +2 谢谢分享 2008-7-14 12:10
  • chen4620263 闪耀度 +1 谢谢分享 2008-7-14 12:10
时时拥有春天般的美丽心情!

TOP

Test System



R700
Reference 9800 GTX +
Radeon HD 3870 X2 OC
Geforce 260 Reference
Sapphire Radeon HD 4870
XFX GeForce GTX 280 XXX
Samsung SyncMaster 305T
Asus P5E3 Deluxe Motherboard
Intel QX99770 (3.2Ghz – 1600fsb)
2x2Gb Corsair DDR3-1800Mhz 7-7-7-20
Akasa 1000w PSU
Benq 16x DVD Writer
LG GBW-H10N Blu-Ray Writer
Xbox 360 HD-DVD Drive                                
Belkin Wireless-G PCI card
3x WD Raptor Hard Drives (OS/Games on RAID 0 Drives)
1x Hitachi Deskstar
Arctic Cooling MX-2 Paste
Arctic Cooling Freezer/ Coolit Freezone Elite
Windows Vista Ultimate 64Bit + SP1
Forceware Release 177.39
Catalyst 8.6
DirectX 9.0c/DirectX 10
Call Of Duty 4 (DX9)
Half-Life 2: Ep2 (DX9)
World In Conflict (DX10)
Crysis (DX10)
PowerDVD 8.0

        The test system was built from scratch, a format of the hard drive was performed (NTFS) and then Windows Vista was installed. Following the completion of the installation, the video drivers were installed. All windows updates were then installed as were the latest builds of the benchmarking tools. Finally, the hard drive was de-fragmented. For each test, the video drivers were set to default quality/optimizations (unless otherwise stated).

Good Benchmarking Practice:

        Where possible, each benchmark was performed three times and the median result for each resolution/setting is shown in the tables that will follow. All applications had their latest patches applied and all hardware features the latest BIOS/Firmware.

        Driver Heaven does not use benchmark scripts. We play the games for long periods of time on various levels and report any unusual findings we see. Then we record with FRAPS across several in game levels recording the averages. This is real world testing and is just how you guys will experience the game.  Occasionally we might throw in a time demo as a further comparison, but we will note it.

时时拥有春天般的美丽心情!

TOP

Call Of Duty 4

Setting



The results

1920*1200


2560*1600





    Infinity Ward has chosen to remain with DirectX9 for this title and some highlights include excellent smoke effects and wall textures. We are testing at 1920x1200 and 2560x1600 with 4x anti-aliasing and 16x anisotropic filtering.

    When testing Call of Duty 4 at 1920x1200 we see that the R700 has near identical performance to the 4870 in CrossFire. This changes when moving up to 2560x1600 and the engineering sample is able to provide higher minimum frames per second due to the additional memory available to each GPU. Looking next to the comparison with the GeForce GTX 280 we see that at both resolutions there is a clear advantage for R700. ATI also have the edge in this test as they have higher levels of anti-aliasing available, currently Nvidia are limited to 4x mode.
时时拥有春天般的美丽心情!

TOP

World In Conflict

Setting






The results

1920*1200


2560*1600



    Testing was performed at 1920x1200 and 2560x1600 with 4x anti-aliasing and 4x anisotropic filtering. All game options were set to very high.

    There are a number of game levels in World in Conflict which are very CPU limited and as a result it can be hard to see the true performance of the GPUs, even the built in benchmark suffers from CPU limitations to a certain extent. We have however identified several segments/levels of game play from some of the latter missions which are not CPU limited and the performance from these areas is shown in the above table.

    World in Conflict shows us the huge performance advantage the R700 has over the 3870 X2. At 1920x1200 the newer product is just over twice the speed and this rises to nearly three times the performance at 2560x1600. We can also see a significant gain over a 4870 CrossFire system when testing at higher resolutions; this is no doubt related to the memory available on the R700.
时时拥有春天般的美丽心情!

TOP

Half Life 2: Episode 2

Setting



The results

1920*1200



2560*1600



    Valve continues to impress us with additions to their Source engine and the latest episode in the Half-Life 2 franchise adds excellent outdoor environments. Testing was performed at 1920x1200 and 2560x1600 with 8x anti-aliasing and 16x anisotropic filtering. All game settings were at their maximum level.

    The average frames per second figure is significantly higher on the R700 than the GTX 280 but that does not tell the whole story as the minimum frames per second is much closer. The ATI card produces a minimum of thirty at 2560x1600 and the GTX is only one frame per second behind.

    It is also possible to see an impressive gain in performance over the 3870 X2 once again with the R700 achieving nearly double the average framerate at 2560x1600 and double the minimum frames per second at 1920x1200.
时时拥有春天般的美丽心情!

TOP

Crysis

Setting




The results



   We are using the 1.2.1 version of Crysis for this test and each run was performed using very high settings with no anti-aliasing and no anisotropic filtering.

   Despite the huge power of the R700 we are still limited to gaming at 1280x768 when using Very High settings in Crysis. As a result we see very little improvement over the 4870 CrossFire system and the GTX 280 is actually able to outperform the R700 in this test. Where we do see some benefits is the comparison with the 3870 X2 where the R700 is significantly faster throughout.
时时拥有春天般的美丽心情!

TOP

Conclusion


     It seems like for the first time in quite a while ATI/AMD are determined to put some real pressure on Nvidia at the high end of the graphics market. In our limited testing it was clear to us that ATI have a product which is able to outperform the GTX 280, on occasion by quite some way. It is not completely dominant however and as games like Crysis show the GTX is still capable of achieving higher framerates than the R700. It should also be taken into account that the R700 relies on the driver to ensure both GPU’s are fully utilised where as the GTX always performs at its maximum level.

     We were also quite surprised to see that the drivers available for the R700 are quite mature, far more so than the versions available to us at the time of the 3870 X2 launch. Other than a bug which affected Race Driver Grid we were able to complete the testing of our full review suite without issue. (NOTE: ATI limited us to the inclusion of four games in this preview. In total eleven were tested behind the scenes.)

     Really the only disappointment with the R700 at the moment is that we are still a few weeks away from it being available to buy. When it does launch we can expect better voltage control, improved drivers and a number of factory overclocked models which will further enhance performance. If ATI can deliver the product at a price which compares well with the GTX 280, which recently dropped as low as £300, then we have a very interesting couple of months ahead of us.
时时拥有春天般的美丽心情!

TOP

刚想来发 被你抢先了。

TOP

把NV全家干光了。 哈哈

TOP

发新话题